Download Foundations of geometry for university students and by Sharipov R.A. PDF

By Sharipov R.A.

Show description

Read Online or Download Foundations of geometry for university students and high-school students PDF

Similar geometry books

Geometry of Homogeneous Bounded Domains

S. G. Gindikin, I. I. Pjateckii-Sapiro, E. B. Vinberg: Homogeneous Kähler manifolds. - S. G. Greenfield: Extendibility homes of genuine submanifolds of Cn. - W. Kaup: Holomorphische Abbildungen in Hyperbolische Räume. - A. Koranyi: Holomorphic and harmonic features on bounded symmetric domain names. - J.

Discontinuous Groups of Isometries in the Hyperbolic Plane

This e-book by means of Jakob Nielsen (1890-1959) and Werner Fenchel (1905-1988) has had
a lengthy and complex historical past. In 1938-39, Nielsen gave a chain of lectures on
discontinuous teams of motions within the non-euclidean airplane, and this led him - in the course of
World struggle II - to put in writing the 1st chapters of the booklet (in German). whilst Fenchel,
who needed to break out from Denmark to Sweden due to the German profession,
returned in 1945, Nielsen initiated a collaboration with him on what turned recognized
as the Fenchel-Nielsen manuscript. at the moment they have been either on the Technical
University in Copenhagen. the 1st draft of the Fenchel-Nielsen manuscript (now
in English) used to be entire in 1948 and it used to be deliberate to be released within the Princeton
Mathematical sequence. in spite of the fact that, as a result of the fast improvement of the topic, they felt
that great adjustments needed to be made prior to book.
When Nielsen moved to Copenhagen college in 1951 (where he stayed till
1955), he used to be a lot concerned with the foreign association UNESCO, and the
further writing of the manuscript was once left to Fenchel. The files of Fenchel now
deposited and catalogued on the division of arithmetic at Copenhagen Univer-
sity comprise unique manuscripts: a partial manuscript (manuscript zero) in Ger-
man containing Chapters I-II (

I -15), and a whole manuscript (manuscript I) in
English containing Chapters I-V (

1-27). The information additionally include a part of a corre-
spondence (first in German yet later in Danish) among Nielsen and Fenchel, the place
Nielsen makes certain reviews to Fenchel's writings of Chapters III-V. Fenchel,
who succeeded N. E. Nf/Jrlund at Copenhagen collage in 1956 (and stayed there
until 1974), was once greatly concerned with an intensive revision of the curriculum in al-
gebra and geometry, and focused his study within the conception of convexity, heading
the foreign Colloquium on Convexity in Copenhagen 1965. for nearly twenty years
he additionally positioned a lot attempt into his activity as editor of the newly began magazine Mathematica
Scandinavica. a lot to his dissatisfaction, this task left him little time to complete the
Fenchel-Nielsen venture the best way he desired to.
After his retirement from the college, Fenchel - assisted via Christian Sieben-
eicher from Bielefeld and Mrs. Obershelp who typed the manuscript - came upon time to
finish the booklet trouble-free Geometry in Hyperbolic house, which used to be released by means of
Walter de Gruyter in 1989 almost immediately after his loss of life. at the same time, and with an identical
collaborators, he supervised a typewritten model of the manuscript (manuscript 2) on
discontinuous teams, removal some of the imprecise issues that have been within the unique
manuscript. Fenchel informed me that he meditated elimination components of the introductory
Chapter I within the manuscript, in view that this might be lined via the e-book pointed out above;
but to make the Fenchel-Nielsen booklet self-contained he eventually selected to not do
so. He did choose to pass over
27, entitled Thefundamental crew.

As editor, i began in 1990, with the consent of the criminal heirs of Fenchel and
Nielsen, to provide a TEX-version from the newly typewritten model (manuscript 2).
I am thankful to Dita Andersen and Lise Fuldby-Olsen in my division for hav-
ing performed an excellent activity of typing this manuscript in AMS- TEX. i've got additionally had
much aid from my colleague J0rn B0rling Olsson (himself a pupil of Kate Fenchel
at Aarhus college) with the facts analyzing of the TEX-manuscript (manuscript three)
against manuscript 2 in addition to with a common dialogue of the difference to the fashion
of TEX. In so much respects we made up our minds to stick to Fenchel's intentions. although, turning
the typewritten variation of the manuscript into TEX helped us to make sure that the notation,
and the spelling of convinced key-words, will be uniform through the e-book. additionally,
we have indicated the start and finish of an evidence within the ordinary variety of TEX.
With this TEX -manuscript I approached Walter de Gruyter in Berlin in 1992, and
to my nice reduction and delight they agreed to submit the manuscript of their sequence
Studies in arithmetic. i'm so much thankful for this optimistic and fast response. One
particular challenge with the e-book grew to become out to be the replica of the numerous
figures that are a vital part of the presentation. Christian Siebeneicher had at
first agreed to convey those in ultimate digital shape, yet by way of 1997 it turned transparent that he
would now not be ready to locate the time to take action. in spite of the fact that, the writer provided an answer
whereby I should still bring targeted drawings of the figures (Fenchel didn't go away such
for Chapters IV and V), after which they'd arrange the construction of the figures in
electronic shape. i'm very thankful to Marcin Adamski, Warsaw, Poland, for his positive
collaboration in regards to the real construction of the figures.
My colleague Bent Fuglede, who has personaHy recognized either authors, has kindly
written a brief biography of the 2 of them and their mathematical achievements,
and which additionally areas the Fenchel-Nielsen manuscript in its right viewpoint. In
this connection i need to thank The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and
Letters for permitting us to incorporate during this booklet reproductions of pictures of the 2
authors that are within the ownership of the Academy.
Since the manuscript makes use of a few unique symbols, an inventory of notation with brief
explanations and connection with the particular definition within the ebook has been incorporated. additionally,
a finished index has been additional. In either situations, all references are to sections,
not pages.
We thought of including an entire record of references, yet made up our minds opposed to it because of
the overwhelming variety of learn papers during this quarter. as a substitute, a miles shorter
list of monographs and different finished debts correct to the topic has been
collected.
My ultimate and so much honest thank you visit Dr. Manfred Karbe from Walter de Gruyter
for his commitment and perseverance in bringing this e-book into life.

Statistics on Special Manifolds

This publication is anxious with statistical research at the specified manifolds, the Stiefel manifold and the Grassmann manifold, taken care of as statistical pattern areas together with matrices. the previous is represented via the set of m x ok matrices whose columns are collectively orthogonal k-variate vectors of unit size, and the latter by way of the set of m x m orthogonal projection matrices idempotent of rank ok.

Extra resources for Foundations of geometry for university students and high-school students

Sample text

A mapping f : a → b is called a congruent translation of a straight line a to a straight line b if for any two points X and Y on the line a the condition of congruence [f (X)f (Y )] ∼ = [XY ] is fulfilled. Let f and h be two congruent translations of a straight line a to a straight line b. If at some two points A and B on te line a these mappings coincide f (A) = h(A), f (B) = h(B), then they coincide at all points X ∈ a, i. e. f = h. 1. 2 show that congruent translations of lines do exist. Indeed, in order to define such a mapping f : a → b it is sufficient to choose two points A and B on the line a and construct the segment [KM ] congruent to [AB] on the line b.

1. From this lemma we derive A ∈ [BC] and X ∈ [BC]. But A ∈ [BC] contradicts the fact that B is an interior point of the segment [AC]. Hence, we should study the second condition B ∈ [AX]. 2. 2 we derive B ∈ [AC] and X ∈ [BC]. Thus, for an arbitrary interior point X = B of the segment [AC] we have shown that X ∈ / [AB] implies X ∈ [BC]. Hence, the required inclusion [AC] ⊂ [AB] ∪ [BC] is proved. 1) it yields the equality [AB] ∪ [BC] = [AC]. 2 is complete. 3. If a point B lies between two other points A and C, then the intersection of the segments [AB] and [BC] consists of exactly one point B.

DIRECTIONS. VECTORS ON A STRAIGHT LINE. 39 mean that the codirectedness relation is reflective, symmetric, and transitive. The fourth property shows that if we factorize the vectors on a straight line with respect to this relation, we get only two equivalence classes, each corresponding one of two possible directions on this line. −−→ Assume that some vector M N on a straight line a is fixed. Let’s agree to call positive the direction given by this vector. −−→ Then the opposite vector N M fixes the negative direction.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.28 of 5 – based on 19 votes